Skip to main content

Table 1 PEDro scores for each study included in this meta-analysis

From: Identifying exercise and cognitive intervention parameters to optimize executive function in older adults with mild cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials

Study

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

Total

Chang et al. [31]

1

1

0

1

0

0

1

0

1

1

1

7

Jurakic et al. [32]

1

1

0

1

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

7

Hsieh et al. [40]

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

6

Huang et al. [54]

1

1

1

1

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

8

Khanthong et al. [55]

1

1

0

1

0

0

1

1

1

1

1

8

Khattak et al. [53]

1

1

1

1

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

8

Law et al. [56]

1

1

0

1

0

0

1

1

1

1

1

8

Lee et al. [14]

1

1

1

1

0

0

1

1

1

1

1

9

Li et al. [20]

1

1

1

1

0

0

1

1

1

1

1

9

Li et al. [30]

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

6

Li et al. [29]

1

1

0

1

0

0

1

1

1

1

1

8

Lü et al. [33]

1

1

0

1

0

0

1

1

1

1

1

8

Liu et al. [36]

1

1

0

1

0

0

1

1

1

1

1

8

Mavros et al. [34]

1

1

0

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

1

9

Parial et al. [28]

1

1

1

1

0

0

1

1

1

1

1

9

Campo et al. [37]

1

1

1

1

0

0

1

1

1

1

1

9

Rojasavastera et al. [35]

1

1

1

1

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

8

Schwenk et al. [41]

1

1

1

1

0

0

1

1

1

1

1

9

Siu et al. [58]

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

6

Song et al. [15]

1

1

1

1

0

0

1

1

1

1

1

9

Sugano et al. [6]

1

1

0

1

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

7

Tao et al. [7]

1

1

0

1

0

0

1

1

1

1

1

8

Thaiyanto et al. [59]

1

0

0

1

0

0

1

1

1

1

1

7

Toots et al. [60]

1

1

1

1

0

0

1

1

1

1

1

9

Uysal et al. [24]

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

10

Varela et al. [61]

1

1

0

1

0

0

1

1

1

1

1

8

Vital et al. [62]

1

0

0

1

0

0

1

1

1

1

1

7

Xia et al. [63]

1

1

1

1

0

0

1

1

1

1

1

9

Yágüez et al. [25]

1

1

0

1

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

7

Yang et al. [26]

1

1

0

1

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

7

Yoon et al. [27]

1

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

1

1

1

6

Average

8

  1. Note The specific 11 category descriptors are listed below
  2. 1. Eligibility criteria were specified
  3. 2. Subjects were randomly allocated to groups (in a crossover study, subjects were randomly allocated an order in which treatments were received)
  4. 3. Allocation was concealed
  5. 4. The groups were similar at baseline regarding the most important prognostic indicators
  6. 5. There was blinding of all subjects
  7. 6. There was blinding of all therapists who administered the therapy
  8. 7. There was blinding of all assessors who measured at least one key outcome
  9. 8. Measures of at least one key outcome were obtained from more than 85% of the subjects initially allocated to groups
  10. 9. All subjects for whom outcome measures were available received the treatment or control condition as allocated or, where this was not the case, data for at least one key outcome was analysed by “intention to treat”
  11. 10. The results of between-group statistical comparisons are reported for at least one key outcome
  12. 11. The study provides both point measures and measures of variability for at least one key outcome